web_logo

Business

Justice Department Adopts Cautious Approach on Witness Protection Applications

Lorenza Manguera

19 Sep, 2025

article image

Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla announced a stringent and cautious process for admitting individuals into the Witness Protection Program (WPP). During a budget hearing held in the House of Representatives, he emphasized that the Department of Justice will not accept applications lightly, ensuring that only those who fully disclose their testimony and withstand thorough scrutiny will qualify.

Remulla pointed out that he personally interviews applicants, including contractors Pacifico "Curlee" and Cezarah "Sarah" Discaya, who have expressed interest but have yet to file a formal application. He stressed the importance of complete transparency, stating, "We are very, very circumspect and conservative in accepting people to the Witness Protection Program. The first requirement, of course, is that the person is telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth."

The Justice Secretary clarified that statements alone are insufficient. Instead, he insisted on verifying accompanying documents such as financial ledgers and records to establish credibility. Interviews are conducted either by a designated panel or by Remulla himself to ensure the integrity of each case.

This declaration followed a call from Mamamayang Liberal party-list Representative Leila de Lima, who urged the DOJ to be selective in its acceptance approach to the WPP.

Responding to queries from Sagip party-list Representative Paolo Marcoleta, Remulla underscored that no final decision has been made to exclude the Discayas, but emphasized that all applicants must adhere strictly to the formal process. "What matters is that we follow a proper procedure to evaluate the witness. It is essential that the person tells the truth, and that the testimony is necessary to uncover the whole truth to hold accountable those who must be punished," he stated.

Addressing the specifics of the Discayas’ allegations, Remulla noted inconsistencies, highlighting that they have only disclosed alleged kickbacks from government contracts over the past three years despite being contractors since 2007. He expressed concerns that their information might be incomplete and indicated a need for further probing.

The Discayas accused several lawmakers of receiving illicit commissions linked to government projects they secured, but critics argue their claims are selective for focusing on transactions post-2022. Remulla’s remarks reflect the DOJ’s commitment to a meticulous and judicious approach in managing potential witnesses and safeguarding the integrity of ongoing investigations.